Home » Volumes » Volume 46 March/April 2013 » Clinical and microbiological features of cryptococcal meningitis

Clinical and microbiological features of cryptococcal meningitis

Lúcia Kioko Hasimoto e Souza[1] Carolina Rodrigues Costa[1] Orionalda de Fátima Lisboa Fernandes[1] Fernando Yano Abrão[1] Thaisa Cristina Silva[1] Carolina Martins Treméa[1] Maria do Rosário Rodrigues Silva[1]

[1]Laboratório de Micologia, Instituto de Patologia Tropical e Saúde Pública, Universidade Federal de Goias, Goiânia, GO.

DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0061-2012


ABSTRACT

Introduction

In this study, the clinical features, underlying diseases and clinical outcomes of patients with cryptococcosis were investigated. In addition, a molecular analysis of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex isolated from these patients was performed.

Methods

A prospective study of 62 cases of patients with cryptococcal infection was conducted at the Hospital de Doenças Tropicais de Goiás Dr. Anuar Auad from 2009-2010. Cryptococcal meningitis cases were diagnosed by direct examination and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample culture. The profiling of these patients was assessed. The CSF samples were submitted to India ink preparation and cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar, and C. neoformans was identified by the production of urease, a positive phenoloxidase test and assimilation of carbohydrates. C. neoformans and C. gattii isolates were distinguished by growth on L-canavanine-glycine-bromothymol blue medium, and molecular analysis was conducted via PCR fingerprinting reactions using M13 and (GACA)4 primers.

Results

From the 62 patients with cryptococcosis, 71 isolates of CSF were obtained; 67 (94.4%) isolates were identified as C. neoformans var. grubii/VNI, and 4 (5.6%) were identified as C. gattii/VGII. Of these patients, 53 had an HIV diagnosis. The incidence of cryptococcosis was higher among patients 20-40 years of age, with 74.2% of the cases reported in males. Cryptococcus-related mortality was noted in 48.4% of the patients, and the symptoms were altered sensorium, headache, fever and stiff neck.

Conclusions

The high morbidity and mortality observed among patients with cryptococcosis demonstrate the importance of obtaining information regarding the epidemiological profile and clinical course of the disease in the State of Goiás, Brazil.

Key words: Cryptococcosis; HIV; Epidemiological and clinical features

INTRODUCTION

Cryptococcosis is a fungal infection resulting from the inhalation of Cryptococcus neoformans species complex present in the environment. This yeast has a strong tropism for the central nervous system (CNS) and causes meningoencephalitis with symptoms that include headache, fever, visual problems and an altered mental state1. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and an expanding population with immunosuppressive therapies have contributed to an increase in cryptococcal disease, which is one of the most important opportunistic infections related to AIDS, particularly in the developing world2,3. Among AIDS patients, the rate of infection ranges from 23% to 48.6%, and approximately 70% to 90% of cryptococcal patients have signs and symptoms of subacute meningitis or meningoencephalitis with high mortality rates4,5. AIDS-associated cryptococcosis is primarily caused by C. neoformans var. grubii(serotype A). C. neoformans var. neoformans (serotype D) and AD hybrids have been recovered from approximately 98% of these patients4,6. A smaller proportion of disease is caused by C. gattii (serotypes B and C), which predominantly affects immunocompetent individuals, and C. gattii is considered to be endemic in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world7.

The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical features, underlying the diseases and clinical outcomes of patients with cryptococcosis and to perform a molecular analysis of Cryptococcus neoformansspecies complex isolates collected from patients with meningitis in a tertiary hospital in Goiânia-GO, Brazil, from 2009 to 2010.

METHODS

Cases series study

A prospective study of 62 patients with cryptococcal infection was conducted in the Hospital de Doenças Tropicais de Goiás Dr. Anuar Auad (a reference hospital for tropical disease) from January 2009 to December 2010. Patients were enrolled if they had a qualitative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture that yielded C. neoformans. Subjects were excluded if they refused to participate in the study. Patient HIV infection status was evaluated according to the standards established by the Ministério da Saúde8. Cases of cryptococcal meningitis were diagnosed by direct examination and culture of CSF samples. Patients were considered to have suffered relapse if the symptoms occurred >6 months after the previous episode9. The epidemiological profile of these patients, including gender, age, underlying diseases, CD4+ T cell count (determined using a FACScan Flow Cytometer – Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), recurrence, clinical outcome and related symptoms, were reviewed in the relevant medical and laboratory records. The molecular type of the Cryptococcus neoformans species complex was identified using PCR fingerprinting.

Microbiology

The 71 CSF samples that originated from 62 patients were submitted to India ink preparation and cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA). C. neoformans was identified by urease production, a positive phenoloxidase test and assimilation of carbohydrates. Species identification was determined using L-canavanine-glycine-bromothymol blue (CGB) medium to distinguish between C. neoformans and C. gattiiisolates10. Molecular analysis was conducted using oligonucleotides of the minisatellite-specific sequence of phage M13 and of the microsatellite-specific sequence (GACA)4 as single primers in the PCR-fingerprinting reactions. The following standard strains representing each molecular type were included in the analysis: C. neoformans WM 148 (VNI-serotype A), WM 626 (VNII-serotype A), WM 628 (VNIII-serotype A-D), WM 629 (VNIV-serotype D), WM 179 (VGI-serotype B), WM 178 (VGII-serotype B), WM 161 (VGIII-serotype C) and WM 779 (VGIV-serotype C). These strains were kindly provided by the Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul11,12. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Doenças Tropicais.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Epi-Info 6.0 software. The proportions were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s Exact test of probability for small number analyses. All statistical tests were two tailed. P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Among the 71 isolates, 67 (94.4%) were identified as C. neoformans var. grubii/VNI, and 4 (5.6%) were identified as C. gattii/VGII. Of the 62 patients with cryptococcosis, 53 had an HIV diagnosis. Infections with C. gattii and C. neoformans var. grubii occurred in 2 and 51 patients, respectively. Among the 53 HIV-infected patients, 81.1% (43/53) had a CD4+ T cell count of <100 cells/mm3, and 18.9% (10/53) had a CD4+ cell count between 200 and 300 cells/mm3. The incidence of cryptococcosis was higher among persons 20-40 years of age (p<0.0001), and 74.2% of the cases were reported in males (p<0.0001). Infection or illness associated with cryptococcosis was observed in 37 patients when they were hospitalized. Oral candidiasis was the most frequent (p=0.0001) illness in 19 patients, followed by toxoplasmosis, tuberculosis (3 HIV+ and 2 HIV- patients) and hanseniasis (4 HIV- patients). Out of 62 patients, Cryptococcus-related mortality was observed in 30 (48.4%) patients with C. gattii as the causative agent in 2. Relapse of cryptococcosis was observed in 9 patients. No significant differences were found in patient characteristics between the HIV-negative and HIV-positive patients. The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 – Main characteristics associated with cryptococcal meningitis cases in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients. 

Characteristics HIV positive(n=53) HIV negative(n=9) Total(n=62)
n % n % n %
Age distribution
 < 20 years 0 0.0 1 11.1 1 1.6
 20-40 years 44 83.0 3 33.3 47 75.8*
 41-60 years 9 17.0 4 44.5 13 21.0
 > 60 years 0 0.0 1 11.1 1 1.6
Gender
 male 39 73.6 7 66.7 46 74.2*
 female 14 26.4 2 22.3 16 25.8
Underlying diseases
 candidiasis 19 35.8 0 0.0 19 30.6*
 hanseniasis 1 1.9 4 44.4 5 8.1
 toxoplasmosis 8 15.1 0 0.0 8 12.9
 tuberculosis 3 5.7 2 3.8 5 8.1
Clinical outcome
 survived 28 52.8 4 44.0 32 51.6
 expired 25 47.2 5 55.6 30 48.4
 recurrence 9 28.1 0 0.0 9 14.5
Species/serotyping
Cryptococcus neoformans/VNI 51 96.2 7 77.8 58 93.5*
Cryptococcus gattii/VGII 2 3.8 2 22.2 4 6.5

*p<0.05;

HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; VNI: serotype A; VGII: serotypes B and C.

At the time of cryptococcosis diagnosis, symptoms were reported in all patients. Of the 62 patients studied, headache (75.8%) was the most common symptom (p=0.0004) followed by fever (61.3%) and stiff neck (58.1%). There were no differences in symptoms between the surviving patients and those who died. Headache was also the most common symptom, but only altered sensorium was significantly (p=0.03) associated with a poor outcome in patients with cryptococcosis. The clinical findings are summarized in Table 2.

TABLE 2 – Clinical manifestations in 62 cryptococcal meningitis patients. 

Signs/symptoms Survivedn=32 Expiredn=30 Totaln=62
n % n % n %
Headache 24 75 23 76.7 47 75.8
Vomiting 12 37.5 16 53.3 28 45.2
Fever 17 53.1 21 70.0 38 61.3
Stiff neck 18 56.2 18 60.0 36 58.1
Altered sensorium* 7 21.8 15 50.0 22 35.5

*p=0.03.

DISCUSSION

Capsular polysaccharide characteristics allow the differentiation of C. neoformans into serotypes A, D and the AD hybrid and of C. gattii into serotypes B and C.

Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii (serotype A) is an opportunistic fungus that affects primarily AIDS patients, whereas C. gattii is a primary pathogen rarely associated with AIDS7,13. Differences in the strain prevalence have been observed in different geographic regions, but according to Lin, C. neoformans var.grubii occurs in 95% of cryptococcal infections in AIDS patients7. Our study supports previous studies14,15performed in Brazil that found that C. neoformans var. grubii is the predominant etiologic agent of cryptococcosis in AIDS patients along with a small percentage of C. gattii isolates. Souza et al. found 80 C. neoformans var. grubii (serotype A) and 4 C. gattii (serotype B) isolates in clinical samples from AIDS patients16. The low C. gattii AIDS coinfection rate obtained in our study may have occurred because this species is not endemic in our geographic region. In the 290 environmental samples collected from pigeon droppings and material associated with the eucalyptus trees of Goiânia-GO, Brazil, Kobayashi et al. observed 41 C. neoformans isolates, which all were identified as C. neoformans var. grubii (serotype A)17.

The majority of the patients in our study (85.5%) had AIDS, and 93.5% (58/62) of isolates were classified as C. neoformans var. grubii. In regards to the molecular types observed in our study, we identified VNI and VGII. These two types are the most common in Brazil18,19. Molecular studies of infective agents may contribute to answering questions about epidemiology and the evaluation of interventions and treatments. Molecular methods suggest that different patients may be infected with a C. neoformans strain that presents the same genetic profile20. In addition, among sequential isolates from the same patient, the response to antifungal therapy may be different21. According to Yee-Chun et al., the rate of mutation is high in VGII isolates, and this could be responsible for a poorer response to antifungal drugs22.

Although cryptococcosis has been reported in patients of all ages, a high incidence was observed in patients between 20 and 40 years of age in this study. A similar age group among cryptococcosis cases has been reported by other investigators15,23,24. Leal et al. observed that 46.2% of patients were 30-39 years old15, whereas in 2008, Leiman and Koifman observed that 84% of patients were 20-40 years old23. The predominance of the male gender (p=0.0001) observed in our study has been consistently reported in cases of cryptococcosis5,15. This mycosis is known to be associated with AIDS, and in these patients, the incidence is higher in men than in women. In 2000, Imwidthaya and Poungvarin reported that cryptococcosis occurred in a proportion of 4 males to 1 female24.

Most patients with cryptococcosis described in our work were HIV infected, but we also identified nine HIV-negative cases. Underlying immunosuppression associated with cryptococcosis in HIV-negative patients has been reported. Hematologic malignancies, autoimmune diseases, sarcoidosis and other diseases that present some degree of immunodeficiency may be risk factors for cryptococcosis25. In our study, four cases of leprosy were associated with cryptococcosis, and we also observed two tuberculosis cases in HIV-negative patients. The association of leprosy or tuberculosis with cryptococcosis has been rarely described in patients not affected by HIV. Azulay et al. described one case of lepromatous leprosy associated with cryptococcosis, but these authors suggested that this occurred due to the prolonged and high doses of corticosteroids used to treat the leprosy reactions26. Van-Tongeren et al. reported one case of coinfection with cryptococcosis caused by C. gattii and tuberculosis27. In the AIDS patients with associated cryptococcal meningitis studied in our work, oral candidiasis occurred in 19 (35.8%) cases. Similar to our results, Baradkar et al. reported that 52.6% of 19 patients who suffered from cryptococcal meningitis had lesions suggestive of oral candidiasis28.

According to a 2011 study by Fidel, oral candidiasis is the first clinical sign of underlying HIV infection, and it occurs in 50% to 90% of all HIV-infected persons during their progression to AIDS29. Our results emphasize the importance of considering more than one infection, even in the absence of evident immunodeficiency.

Several symptoms, such as headache, fever, vomiting, altered sensorium and stiff neck, are observed in cryptococcosis patients. In most studies, headache is considered the predominant clinical manifestation4,30. Similar to the results of Aslan and Chandrasekhara, in the present study, headache was the most common symptom observed, and altered sensorium was determined to be the poorest prognostic factor30. According to Satishchandra et al., the development of altered sensorium denotes a poor prognosis4. Although several symptoms were detected in cryptococcal meningitis patients in the present study, only altered sensorium was independently associated with poor outcome (p=0.03). The high mortality rate of cryptococcal meningitis in AIDS patients may also be associated with some risk factors such as low CD4+cell counts. These cells are considered a marker of the progression of HIV infection and AIDS that reflects advanced immunossupression27. Thus, the low CD4+ cell count verified in our patients, as 81.1% of our patients had a cell count <100 cells/mm3, may have contributed to the increased mortality. Similar results have been obtained by several investigators who observed patients with a mean CD4+ count <100 cells/mm3. Such clinical findings are associated with a high mortality rate in cryptococcosis patients28,29. Mortality in HIV-negative patients is difficult to explain; however, for four patients, the cause of mortality was acute respiratory failure due to pneumococcal pneumonia. Respiratory failure is one of the top causes of death in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia33.

To the best of our knowledge, the epidemiological profile of the cryptococcal meningitis patients associated with the clinical outcomes described in our work represents the first study performed in State of Goiás, Brazil. These findings could play an important role in aiding the evaluation of cryptococcal meningitis trends in our state by highlighting the knowledge of the species, serotype, clinical outcome, presence of underlying diseases and symptoms associated with poor prognosis.

REFERENCES

1. Brizendine KD, Pappas PG. Cryptococcal meningitis: Current approaches to management in patients with and without AIDS. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2010; 12:229-305. [ Links ]

2. Deak E, Park BJ. Cryptococcal meningitis – Global Public Health Challenges and opportunities. European Infectious Disease 2011; 5:83-87. [ Links ]

3. Dean D, Berger JR. Neuro-AIDS in the developing word. Neurology 2012; 78:499-500. [ Links ]

4. Satishchandra P, Mathew T, Gadre G, Nagarathna S, Chandramukhi A, Mahadevan A. Cryptococcal meningitis: Clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic overviews. Neurology India 2007; 55:226-231. [ Links ]

5. Mitchell TG, Perfect JR. Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS-100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995; 8:515-548. [ Links ]

6. Franzot SP, Salkin IF, Casadevall A. Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii: separate varietal status for Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:838-840. [ Links ]

7. Lin X. Cryptococcus neoformans: morphogenesis, infection and evolution. Infec Genet Evol 2009; 68:133-216. [ Links ]

8. Ministério da Saúde. Dados e pesquisa em DSTs e AIDS. Coordenação do Programa Nacional de DST/AIDS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2002. [ Links ]

9. Perfect JR, Dismukes WE, Dromer F, Graybill JR, Hamill RJ, Harrison TS, et al. Clinical Pratice Guidelines for the Management of Cryptococcal Disease: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 50:291-322. [ Links ]

10. KJ Kwon-Chung, Polacheck I, Bennett JE. Improved diagnostic medium for separation of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans (serotypes A and D) and Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii (serotypes Band C). J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15:535-537. [ Links ]

11. Meyer W, Marszewska K, Amirmostofian M, Igreja RP, Hardtke C, Methling K, et al. Molecular typing of global isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA-a pilot study to standardize techniques on which to base a detailed epidemiological survey. Electrophoresis 1999; 20:1790-1799. [ Links ]

12. Lin X, Heitman J. The biology of the Cryptococcus neoformans species Complex. Annu Rev Microbiol 2006; 60:69-105. [ Links ]

13. Franzot SP, Salkin IF, Casadevall A. Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii separate varietal status for Cryptococcus neoformans serotype A isolates. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:838-840. [ Links ]

14. Mora DJ, Colombo ERC, Ferreira-Pain K, Andrade-Silva LE, Nascentes GAN, Silva-Vergara ML. Clinical, epidemiological and outcome features of patients with cryptococcosis in Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mycopathol 2012; 173:321-327. [ Links ]

15. Leal AK, Faganello J, Fuentefria AM, Boldo JT, Bassanesi MC, Vainstein MH. Epidemiological profile of cryptococcal meningitis patients in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Mycophathol 2008; 166:71-75. [ Links ]

16. Souza LKH, Souza Jr AH, Costa CR, Faganello J, Vainstein MH, Chagas ACM et al. Molecular typing and antifungal suscetibility of clinical and environmental Cryptococcus neoformans species complex isolates in Goiânia, Brazil. Mycoses 2009; 53:62-67. [ Links ]

17. Kobayashi CA, Souza LKH, Fernandes OFL, Brito SCA, Silva AC, Sousa ED, et al. Characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from urban environmental sources in Goiânia, Goiás State, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 2005; 47:203-207. [ Links ]

18. Trilles L, Lazera MS, Oliveira RV, Barbosa GG, Nishikawa MM, Morales BP, et al. Regional pattern of the molecular types of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2008; 103:455-462. [ Links ]

19. Matos CS, Andrade AS, Oliveira NS, Barros TF. Microbiological characteristics of clinical isolates of Cryptococcus spp. in Bahia, Brazil: molecular types and antifungal susceptibilities. Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis 2012; 31:1647-1652. [ Links ]

20. Martins MA, Pappalardo MCSM, Melhem MS, Pereira-Chioccola VL. Molecular diversity of serial Cryptococcus neoformans isolates from AIDS patients in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007; 102:777-784. [ Links ]

21. Almeida AMF, Matsumoto MT, Baeza LC, Silva RBO, Kleiner AAP, Melhen MSC, et al. Molecular typing and antifungal susceptibility of clinical sequential isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans from São Paulo State, Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 2007; 7:152-164. [ Links ]

22. Yee-Chen C, Shan-Chwen C, Chiang-Ching S, Chien-Ching H, Kwen-Tay L, Yueh-Shya P, et al. Clinical features and in vitro susceptibilities of the two varieties of Cryptococcus neoformans in Taiwan. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 36:175-183. [ Links ]

23. Leimann BCQ, Koifman RJ. Cryptococcal meningitis in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil, 1994-2004. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24:2582-2592. [ Links ]

24. Imwidthaya P, Poungvarin N. Cryptococcosis in AIDS. Postgrad Med J 2000; 76:85-88. [ Links ]

25. Kiertiburanakul S, Wirojtananugoon S, Pracharktam R, Sungkanuparphs. Cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients. Int J Infect Dis 2006; 10:72-78. [ Links ]

26. Azulay RV, Mendonça IRM, Santos CM, Monteiro PCF, Lazera MS, Kac BK, et al. Cutaneous cryptococcosis associated with lepromatous leprosy. Int J Dermatol 2001; 40:412-414. [ Links ]

27. Van Tongeren L, Shaipanich T, Fleetham JA. Coinfection with Cryptococcus gattii and Mycobacterium in an otherwise healthy 18-year-old woman. Can Respir J 2011; 18:62-63. [ Links ]

28. Baradkar V, Mathur M, De A, Kumar S, Rathi M. Prevalence and clinical presentation of Cryptococcal meningitis among HIV seropositive patients. Indian J Sex Transm Dis 2009; 30:19-22. [ Links ]

29. Fidel Jr PL. Candida-host interactions in HIV disease: implications for oropharyngeal candidiasis. Adv Dent Res 2011; 23:45-49. [ Links ]

30. Aslan SMS, Chandrasekhara P. Study of cryptococcal meningitis in HIV seropositive patients in a Tertiary Care Center. JIACM 2009; 10:110-115. [ Links ]

31. Porichis F, Kaufmann DE. HIV-specific CD4 T cells and immune control of viral replication. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 2011; 6:174-180. [ Links ]

32. Darras-Jolly C, Chevret S, Wolff M, Matheron S, Longuet P, Casalino E, et al. Cryptococcus neoformans infection in France: epidemiologic features of and early prognostic parameters for 76 patients who were infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 23:369-376. [ Links ]

33. Mongardon N, Max A, Bouglé A, Pène F, Lemiale V, Charpentier J, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of severe pneumococcal pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit: a multicenter study. Critical Care 2012; 16:R155. [ Links ]

Received: November 26, 2012; Accepted: May 21, 2013

Address to: Dra. Lúcia Kioko Hasimoto e Souza. Rua dos Tinguis Q29A, L13 – Aldeia do Vale, 76480-135 Goiânia, GO, Brasil. Phone: 55 62 9228-2726; Fax: 55 62 3209-6363. e-mail: lucia@padrao.com.br

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.