Home » Volumes » Volume 46 September/October 2013 » Spraying food sources with pyrethroid to control peridomestic triatomines

Spraying food sources with pyrethroid to control peridomestic triatomines

Maria Hismênia Máximo Garcia[1] Claudio Teixeira Pinto[2] Elias Seixas Lorosa[3] Rita de Cássia Moreira de Souza[4] Liléia Diotaiuti[4]

[1]Secretaria Estadual de Saúde do Ceará, Forteleza, CE [2]Bayer CropScience, Rio de Janeiro, RJ [3]Laboratório Nacional e Internacional de Referência em Taxonomia de Triatomíneos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ [4]Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG

DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-1614-2013


ABSTRACT

Introduction

We attempted to supplement traditional insecticide spraying by treating peridomiciliar food sources with a powder formulation.

Methods

Two groups of houses were treated with deltamethrin suspension concentrate (SC), one of which had its primary peridomestic food sources treated with deltamethrin 2P.

Results

Triatoma brasiliensis was the most commonly captured triatomine. Birds, dogs and rodents were the major food sources identified by the precipitin reaction; 554 domestic animals received powder treatment. A sharp reduction in infestation rates was observed in the two groups up to 360 days after spraying.

Conclusion

The combination SC + 2P did not improve the control of triatomines.

Key words: Chagas Disease; Epidemiology and vector control

The strategy for Chagas disease control primarily consists of the interruption of vectorial transmission through the application of insecticides with residual effects in infested houses and peridomestic structures. In 1991, because of the Initiative of the Southern Cone Countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay), the Chagas Disease Control Program/Brazilian Health Service (CDCP/FUNASA) began to prioritize areas of Triatoma infestans Klůg 1834 infestation 1 , which caused Brazil to receive a certification of triatomine vector transmission elimination 2 . However, in Brazil, there are 62 recognized species of triatominae 3 , and the occurrence of native triatomine species that sporadically invade or reinvade human dwellings constitutes a major challenge for successful vector control 4 .

In the northeastern part of Brazil, T. brasiliensis Neiva 1911 is the major insect vector. The Chagas Disease Control Program (CDCP) is capable of promoting the reduction of triatomine populations in an artificial environment. However, due to its widespread occurrence in the natural environment, the proximity of houses to these silvatic triatomine populations and the capacity of this species to adapt to environmental conditions and to the hosts that are present in the artificial environment, intradomicile recolonization often occurs after spraying 5 . Among the factors that could influence the process of recolonization of the houses and peridomiciles are the following: I) a probable transience of the insecticides due to the high temperatures of the northeastern region; II) the difficulty of ensuring that the insecticide accesses the hiding places where the triatomines lodge themselves, allowing for insect survival; III) the possibility of operational failures in spraying; and IV) the possibility of the triatomines developing resistance to pyrethroids, as observed in other countries 6,7 and in Brazil 8 .

The peridomestic environment represents an important target for the control of various triatomine species. In Brazil, residual triatomine foci are primarily found on peridomestic livestock, which represent a serious challenge to the national vector control program 1 . The transference of responsibility for vector control activities to Brazilian municipalities caused discontinuity in the CDCP’s efforts. Thus, it is critical that municipalities assume their role in the National Health System to guarantee the continuity of triatomine control 2 . However, it is also crucial to develop methodologies that involve both the location and control of residual foci. Deltamethrin, for which a large amount of experience and information exists, was the first pyrethroid introduced into the CDCP/FUNASA control program. Its long residual action indoors was proven in the States of Minas Gerais 9 , Goiás 10 and Ceará 5 under varying climatic regimes and different housing construction patterns. As with the other pyrethroids, the most appropriate formulation for triatomine control is the suspension concentrate because in this formulation, the number of molecules remaining on the wall surfaces is greater; therefore, its activity is maintained for longer periods. Deltamethrin powder (2P) is a formulation that is completely insoluble in water. The 2P formula is commercially available and indicated for environments where aqueous formulations are not applied, such as animal nests to combat ectoparasites. Applied directly, the final given dose is very low, which enables the safe treatment of animals. The dusting of chickens with approximately 5-10g of talc does not interfere with the consumption of the animal, even on the same day as the application of the product, because the dose capable of producing toxicity in mammals via oral administration is 1,000mg/kg body weight. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess whether the additional dusting of major food sources with deltamethrin 2P, in addition to traditional spraying, would help to reduce insect contact and would thus reduce the infestation and peridomestic triatomine density.

The work was conducted in Tamboril district, which is located 301.2km from Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil. Twenty sites were subjected to infestation research following the methodology employed by the CDCP (manual capture, 30′ inside the house and 30′ out into the peridomicile). The sample was composed of the infested domiciliary units, which were divided into two randomly selected groups. After the preliminary capture to determine the infestation rates, the groups received different treatments with insecticides. In both groups, the infested domiciliary units were sprayed with a suspension concentrate (SC) of deltamethrin at a dose of 25mg ai/m2, but one of the groups (56 houses) also had its major food sources (dogs, chickens, ducks, turkeys) and bird nests dusted with deltamethrin powder (10g of talc/kg body weight), as recommended by the manufacturer. The other group (the control) included 62 infested houses. Entomological data were collected to determine the infestation rates: intra- and peridomestic triatomines were captured 30 days after spraying and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after spraying using the same methodology that was used before spraying. The identification of the triatomines and examinations for Trypanosoma cruzi infection were performed at the pre-treatment time point and at the final time point; at the 3rd, 6th and 9th month time points, the insects were identified (species and instar) in the field, without capture, to prevent interference with the process of rebuilding the triatomine population after spraying.

To identify the food source, the stomach contents of triatomines that were captured before spraying were identified by the precipitin reaction. The antisera preparation, titer determination and specificity were performed according to Lorosa 11 . The blood sources investigated were anti-human (1:15,000), rodent (1:15,000), bird (1:10,000), opossum (1:12,000), dog (1:15,000) cat (1:12,000), steer (1:15,000) and horse (1:13,000).

The infestation results of the intradomicile, peridomicile and domestic units (DUs) before and after treatment with deltamethrin are shown in Table 1 . The infestation rates at the pre-treatment time point were 37.1% and 48.4% for the DUs treated with either SC + 2P or only SC, respectively. At each evaluation, a number of houses were lost for different reasons (closed house, painting or washing the walls). The intradomicile readings remained negative up to 270 days after the spraying, regardless of the treatment used. The location of insects in the peridomiciles was always associated with piles of bricks, tile or wood, chicken coops, barns, stables or perches.

TABLE 1 – Infestation of the domestic units in Tamboril, State of Ceará, before and after treatment with deltamethrin (SC 25mg ai/m2 and/or powder 10g/kg weight). 

Treatment Evaluation Treated (n) DU I P % DU % I % P
Spraying with SC pre-treatment 128 62 32 37 48.4 25.0 28.9
30 days 60 1 0 1 1.7 0.0 1.7
90 days 61 3 0 3 4.9 0.0 4.9
180 days 53 3 0 3 5.7 0.0 5.7
270 days 46 2 0 2 4.3 0.0 4.3
360 days 44 3 1 2 6.8 2.3 4.5
SC+2P pre-treatment 151 56 22 41 37.1 14.6 27.2
30 days 55 4 0 4 7.3 0.0 7.3
90 days 55 2 0 2 3.6 0.0 3.6
180 days 40 6 0 6 15.0 0.0 15.0
270 days 37 3 0 3 8.1 0.0 8.1
360 days 35 4 1 4 11.4 2.9 11.4

DU: domestic unit = intradomicile + peridomiciliar structures; I: intradomicile; P: peridomicile; SC: suspension concentrate.

Two hundred forty-four insects were captured at the pre-treatment time point. Of these, 60 adults and 61 nymphs of T. brasiliensis were captured in the DUs that were treated with SC, and 57 adults and 66 nymphs were captured in DUs treated with SC + 2P. T. cruzi infection was identified in 0.4% of the 231 examined triatomines. In the post-treatment survey, only two specimens were captured in the intradomicile environment, an adult T. brasiliensis and an adult Panstrongylus lutzi Neiva & Pinto 1926, both at 360 days after spraying.

Altogether, 554 domestic animals and 55 bird nests were treated with deltamethrin 2P, in addition to the traditional DU treatment with SC ( Table 2 ). Throughout the course of the study, no difference was identified between groups with respect to the percentage of infestation and peridomestic triatomine density (χ2 test, p>0.05).

TABLE 2 – Food sources present in dwellings and dusted with deltamethrin 2P in the district of Tamboril, State of Ceará, Brazil. 

Host Existing Treated
n %
Chickens 819 438 53.5
Ducks 78 34 43.6
Turkeys 47 40 85.1
Dogs 51 42 82.4
Nests/birds 55 55 100.0
Total 1,050 609 58.0

The results of the blood meal identification were based on 94 T. brasiliensis specimens. In total, 10 (10.6%) samples did not react to any of the antisera tested, 66 (70.2%) reacted to a single source, 16 (17%) to two sources and two (2.1%) to three sources ( Table 3 ). Birds were the most common food source. By grouping the insects that fed on a single source with those that fed on two or more, the most common source was bird blood, found in 45 (47.9%) samples, followed by rodent blood, found in 23 (20.2%) samples. Other food sources included 10 (10.6%) samples with dog blood, two (2.1%) with horse blood and six (6.4%) with opossum blood.

TABLE 3 – Feeding sources identified by the reaction of precipitin in a sample of Triatoma brasiliensis captured in the district of Tamboril, State of Ceará, before the deltamethrin treatment. 

Food sources Hosts Total
n %
1 bird 40 42.5
dog 6 6.4
opossum 4 4.3
rodent 16 17.0
2 bird/opossum 3 3.2
bird/horse 2 2.1
bird/rodent 4 4.3
bird/dog 4 4.3
rodent/dog 2 2.1
horse/dog 1 1.1
3 bird/dog/opossum 1 1.1
bird/opossum/rodent 1 1.1
did not react 10 10.6
Insect total 94 100.0

Recent advances in the prevention and control of Chagas disease have brought both new challenges and a new examination of the epidemiological disease characteristics. The Brazilian program is in the surveillance stage, and in this respect, efforts should focus on maintaining results, consolidating the control of residual foci and preventing the establishment of new foci of vectorial transmission. However, the epidemiology of Chagas disease is extremely complex due to the presence of native species that exist in close association with wild reservoirs. In this context, T. brasiliensis is one of the most important species in the transmission of Chagas disease in Brazil and is the major vector species in the northeast.

In this study, during the pre-treatment research, we found that 32 (25%) and 22 (14.6%) of houses were infested. The application of pyrethroid ensured that the dwellings were free of infestation for up to 270 days after spraying. Only after 360 days were two homes recorded as infested: one in the group receiving treatment with SC and the other in the group treated with SC + 2P. These data corroborate data from other studies on the large impact and long residual effect of pyrethroid 10,12 , even under the adverse conditions of the Ceará Caatinga, as they kept indoor areas infestation-free for up to nine months.

The aspect of these results that deserves the most attention is the slowness of the peridomestic reinfestation, unlike observations from other experiments. These results can be attributed to the excellent quality of the spraying or the environmental characteristics, which are perhaps connected to the poorest wild river-heads in the region. Previous studies in the State of Ceará show that from the fourth month after treatment of infested houses with pyrethroid, this triatomine species is captured primarily in peridomestic environments 5,13 , possibly due to the success of reinvading wild populations that inhabit stones that are very close to the houses. Moreover, triatomine control in peridomiciles is very limited due to their complex organization and the difficulty of spraying all sites in which these vectors can lodge. Many places do not receive the insecticide at the time of spraying, enabling the survival of insects that can then re-infest the area during the months following the spraying 5,14 . Another aggravating factor, which is particularly common in the northeast, is the constant renovation of the peridomicile 13 . This circumstance creates potential shelters for triatomines that are completely unprotected by insecticide and enables the establishment of new foci of infestation. Considering these factors, we proposed testing the dusting of the major food sources of triatomines with deltamethrin 2P to compensate for the limitations presented by the peridomiciles and ultimately to strengthen the vector control strategies. However, we did not observe any difference between the two treatments. The data do not suggest decreased contact with the food source that could promote a reduction in triatomine infestation or density. This finding is likely due to the low permanence and stability of the product in the environment, which should be increased when in contact with the skin of domestic animals that exhibit different behaviors (swimming, ground scratching, skin scratching, etc.).

The results of food source identification reveal a strong association between T. brasiliensis and birds. In the natural environment, these triatomines are mostly found on rocks. In the peridomicile, in turn, chickens are common and travel freely in the yard. Considering the proximity between these environments and the high availability of these animals, we can assume that these factors have contributed to the precipitin test results. Among the investigated domestic animals, dogs are the second-most important food source for the vectors present in this locality. Opossums and rodents, which are extremely important hosts because they are a link between wild and peridomestic cycles 15 , are also important food sources for these vectors. However, at the time of this study, none of the above-mentioned hosts played an important role in vector infection, as only one specimen (0.4%) contained a flagellate in its intestinal contents.

Thus, we conclude that the application of insecticide powder to the major food sources for the triatomines did not influence the process of DU infestation when compared to the control. In the intradomicile, the spraying rate was sufficient to keep the houses free of triatomines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks to Secretaria Estadual de Saúde do Ceará and Bayer Crop Science.

REFERENCES

1. Dias JCP. O controle da doença de Chagas no Brasil. In: Silveira AC (org.). El control de la enfermedad de Chagas en los países del cono sur de América. Uberaba, MG: Faculdade de Medicina do Triângulo Mineiro; 2002. p. 145-250. [ Links ]

2. Dias JCP. Doença de Chagas: Sucessos e desafios. Cad Saude Publica 2006; 22:2020-2021. [ Links ]

3. Silva MBA, Barreto AVMS, Silva HA, Galvão C, Rocha D, Jurberg J, et al. Synanthropic triatomines (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil: geographical distribution and natural Trypanosoma infection rates between 2006 and 2007. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012; 45:60-65. [ Links ]

4. Silveira AC. Os novos desafios e perspectivas futuras do controle. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2011; 44 (supl II):122-124. [ Links ]

5. Diotaiuti L, Faria Filho O, Carneiro FCF, Dias JCP, Pires HHR, Schofield CJ. Aspectos operacionais do controle do Triatoma brasiliensis. Cad. Saude Publica 2000; 16:61-67 [ Links ]

6. Vassena CV, Picollo MI, Zerba EN. Insecticide resistance in Brazilian Triatoma infestans and Venezuelan Rhodnius prolixus. Med Vet Entomol 2000; 14:51-55. [ Links ]

7. Fabro J, Sterkel M, Capriotti N, Mougabure-Cueto G, Germano M, Rivera-Pomar R, et al. Identification of a point mutation associated with pyrethoid resistance in the para-type sodium channel of Triatoma infestans, a vector of Chagas’ disease. Infect Genet Evol 2012; 12:487-491. [ Links ]

8. Pessoa GCD. Monitoramento da suscetibilidade ao piretróide deltametrina em populações de Triatoma sordida Stål, 1859 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). [Dissertation]. [Belo Horizonte]: Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou; 2008. 95p. [ Links ]

9. Pinchin R, Oliveira Filho AM, Fanara DM, Gilbert B. Ensaio de campo para avaliação das possibilidades de uso da decametrina (OMS 1998) no combate a triatomíneos. Rev Brasil Malariol D Trop 1980; 32:36-41. [ Links ]

10. Diotaiuti L, Pinto CT. Suscetibilidade biológica do Triatoma sordida e Triatoma infestans a deltametrina e a lambdacyhalotrina em condições de campo. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1991; 24:151-155. [ Links ]

11. Lorosa ES, Andrade RE, Santos SM, Pereira CA. Estudo da infecção natural e da fonte alimentar do Triatoma sordida, (Stål, 1859), (Hemiptera – Reduviidae) na região norte de Minas Gerais, Brasil, através da reação de precipitina. Entomol Vect 1998; 5:13-22. [ Links ]

12. Dias JCP, Pinto CT, Barreiros H, Vasconcelos JRA, Loiola CCP, Silva MA. Emprego da deltametrina e cyflutrina contra triatomíneos em áreas de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 1986; 19:47-48. [ Links ]

13. Oliveira Filho AM, Melo MT, Santos CE, Faria Filho OF, Carneiro FC, Oliveira-Lima JW, et al. Focal and total residual insecticide spraying to control Triatoma brasiliensis and Triatoma pseudomaculata in Northeast Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2000; 16:105-111. [ Links ]

14. Diotaiuti L, Azerdo BVM, Busek SCU, Fernandes AJ. Controle do Triatoma sordida no peridomicílio rural do município de Porteirinha, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publ 1998; 3:21-25. [ Links ]

15. Diotaiuti L, Pereira AS, Loiola CF, Fernandes AJ, Schofield CJ, Dujardin JP, et al. Interrelation of sylvatic and domestic transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi in areas with and without domestic vectorial transmission in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1995; 90:443-448. [ Links ]

Received: May 25, 2012; Accepted: September 18, 2012

Address to: Dra. Liléia Diotaiuti. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/FIOCRUZ. Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, 30190-002 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. Phone: 55 31 3349-7761. e-mail: diotaiuti@cpqrr.fiocruz.br

CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.